Skip to content

I get commissions for purchases made through links in this article.

Samsung 980 Pro vs WD Black SN850: The Best Gen4 NVMe SSD?

    Samsung 980 Pro is one of the best PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs out there. One of its main competitors is the WD Black SN850. The data read/write speed of both these SSDs is almost similar. So, if you are looking to get a PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD and are confused between these two both, I am going to help you pick the right one here in this article.

    First of all, let’s discuss the theoretical read/write speeds of both.

    So, the Samsung 980 Pro can reach up to 7000MB/s and 5000MB/s sequential data read/write speed.

    WD Black SN850 can reach up to 7000MB/s and 5300MB/s sequential data read/write speed.

    Theoretically, the WD Black SN850 is offering a better data write speed while the read speed of both is the same. But, there are several other things to consider before you buy an SSD. Especially these PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSDs which are way too expensive, you should pay close attention to each detail.

    So, let’s compare everything which is important and by the end of this article, I will give my genuine opinion on this comparison.

    If you are OK with an SSD that doesn’t have any encryption, WD Black SN850 is a good option for you. WD Black SN850 comes with a higher sequential write speed, higher MTBF, 2 extra controller channels and better overall performance.

    Let’s talk some more about it.

    First of all, let’s compare all the main specifications that the brands are offering with their products. So, let’s do a quick Samsung 980 Pro vs WD Black SN850 theoretical specs comparison below.

    SpecificationSamsung 980 ProWD Black SN850
    Storage Variants250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB500GB, 1TB, 2TB
    Theoretical Read Speed (Max.)7,000 MB/s7,000 MB/s
    Theoretical Write Speed (Max.)5,000 MB/s5,300 MB/s
    Random Read (4K, QD32) (Max.)Up to 1,000,000 IOPSUp to 1,000,000 IOPS
    Random Write (4K, QD32) (Max.)Up to 1,000,000 IOPSUp to 1,000,000 IOPS
    Form Factor/InterfaceM.2 (2280)/PCIe® Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe™ 1.3cM.2 (2280)/PCIe Gen 4.0 x 4, NVMe 1.3
    MTBF (Reliability)1.50 Million Hours1.75 Million Hours
    Warranty5 Years5 Years
    T.R.I.M.SupportedSupported
    S.M.A.R.T.SupportedSupported
    EncryptionAES 256-bit EncryptionNo hardware encryption
    Heatsink OptionAvailableAvailable
    Image
    AvailabilityCheck PriceCheck Price

    Almost all the specifications are similar in both SSDs. So, we can’t come to any conclusion here. Now, let’s compare other things to make this comparison much clear.

    The testbench is utilizing an Intel Core i5 12700K CPU along with a 4200MHz DDR5 16GB RAM kit. The motherboard is MSI Z590-A Pro. These tests are done on the 1TB variants of both SSDs.

    PCMark 10 is one of the most popular benchmark software especially used by professionals. The quick system drive benchmark test is a smaller test utilizing smaller tests with softer real-world traces. This test is actually made for the drives which can’t handle the heavy load of Full System Drive Benchmark. The Full System Drive Benchmark, on the other hand, is full of heavy real-world traces from various popular applications. I have done both these tests and the comparison is as follows.

    PCMark 10 Scores Comparison between Samsung 980 Pro and WD Black SN850 (Bar Graph)
    Samsung 980 Pro vs WD Black SN850 PCMark 10 Full Benchmark Comparison (Bar Graph)

    Anvil’s Storage Utilities is our next benchmark software with a pretty simple interface. It runs all the tests automatically and give you a final score. A higher number means better performance. It runs a wide array of tests including Seq 4MB, 4K, 4K QD4, 4K QD16, 32K, and 128K, in both read and write formats

    Anvil's storage utilities performance benchmark comparison (Bar graph samsung 980 pro vs wd black sn850)

    AS SSD is another very popular storage benchmarking software. It again runs some random tests to test sequential and random performance. You can set the test size from 1GB to 10GB. It will give you a score that can be helpful to compare the performance of two different SSDs.

    AS SSD Storage benchmark comparison (Bar graph samsung 980 pro vs wd black sn850)

    CrystalDismMark is another simple-to-use storage benchmark software. It is generally used to run sequential and random system tests using different file sizes. The default sequential read/write test is 1M at Q8T1 and Q1T1. The default random read/write test is 4KB at Q32T1 and Q1T1. You can easily change these test types along with the total test file size.

    CDM Sequential Benchmark Scores (WD Black SN850 wins)
    CDM random Benchmark Scores (WD Black SN850 wins)

    Benchmark Results Analysis: All the benchmark tests are won by WD Black SN850. The differences are minimal. But, still, the winner is the winner.

    Here, I would like to recommend you watch this great comparison video from the SkuezTech YouTube channel. You will find how long these SSDs are taking to load some software and games. So, make sure to watch this comparison.

    It is very important to know the overall endurance ratings of your SSD before buying it. Here, we are talking about two of the most popular SSDs out there in the market. So, it becomes important to discuss how long there are going to last with you. So, let’s see and compare.

    ParameterSamsung 980 ProWD Black SN850
    TBW250GB: 150 TBW
    500GB: 300 TBW
    1TB: 600 TBW
    2TB: 1,200 TBW
    500GB: 300 TBW
    1TB: 600 TBW
    2TB: 1,200 TBW
    Warranty5-Years Limited Warranty5-Years Limited Warranty
    MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure)1.50 Million Hours1.75 Million Hours

    The TBW ratings of both these SSDs are the same. Also, both come with the 5 years limited warranty period. However, the WD Black SN850 has got a little higher MTBF.

    If you don’t know what MTBF is, it stands for Mean Time Between Failure. It indicates the estimated time for how long your SSD is going to work.

    In my point of view, this is the most important part of this comparison. If you are aware of your SSD’s technical specifications, you can easily say whether it is going to work well for you or not. Here, we are going to compare both Samsung 980 Pro and WD Black SN850’s technical details.

    Technical SpecificationSamsung 980 ProWD Black SN850
    NAND Flash TypeSamsung 3-bit MLC V-NANDSandisk’s TLC 3D
    NAND Flash Layers128/136
    ControllerSamsung Elpis ControllerWD Proprietary Controller
    Controller ConfigurationsNot SpecifiedNot Specified
    CacheDDR4 SDRAMDDR4 DRAM
    Heatsink OptionAvailableAvailable
    T.R.I.M.AvailableAvailable
    S.M.A.R.T.AvailableAvailable
    EncryptionAES 256-bit Encryption (Class 0)Not Available
    WebsiteSamsung 980 ProWD Black SN850

    Another thing to discuss here is that Samsung 980 Pro comes with the SLC Write cache which enhances the data write speed more than the actual limits. They call it Intelligent TurboWrite Technology. The size of this SLC cache is different in different SSD variants but it actually helps a lot when you are writing data. You can know more about it here.

    The WD Black SN850 has also got the SLC Cache which you can know more about here. but, the total size of this SLC cache is a little lesser as compared to that of the Samsung 980 Pro.

    The main thing to talk about here is Samsung’s misleading NAND name. They can their NAND 3-bit MLC which is basically a TLC NAND Flash. So, don’t get confused by these terms. The kind of NAND used in both SSDs is the same.

    Price is the next big factor here. Although, these SSDs are not easy to afford and users only with a good budget will be looking for these. But, still, you should check the current prices because there could be a substantial difference sometimes.

    In my opinion, you will not regret buying any of these SSDs. But, if you want the best performance in longer runs with server-level storage performance, just go for the WD Black SN850.

    However, if you are going to buy your SSD for personal use, the Samsung 980 Pro is a good pick for you.

    As we discussed earlier, if you are serious about the encryption and want it on your SSD, there is no choice except Samsung 980 Pro because WD Black SN850 is missing it. In other areas like sequential/random data read/write performance, synthetic benchmarks, and reliability, WD Black SN850 beats the Samsung 980 Pro.

    So, in terms of performance and reliability, WD Black SN850 has a lot of better things to offer.

    Kingston KC30007000/5000 MB/s
    Intelligent TurboWrite Technology
    TLC NAND
    256-bit Encryption
    Check Price
    Seagate Firecuda 5307300/6900 MB/s
    DDR4 DRAM
    TLC NAND
    256-bit Encryption
    Check Price

    Let me know what you think about it in the comments!

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    10 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Sanni
    Sanni
    5 months ago

    Thanks very much, a have the both able to buy , and at roughly the same price just now , ur full review n video was really worth looking at as I,m not that tech savvy at all but a get the just of it , BIG THANKS as u helped me know which to go after 1st 980 pro , cos of encryption a thought the 1.75 million hours of Wdblack N850 would have bought me , but encryption seems more reliable, cheers

    James
    James
    4 months ago

    3bit MLC is simply TLC. They do not differ in that respect.

    Mark baker
    Mark baker
    3 months ago

    This intel article begs to differ on MLC vs TLC
    SLC single bit per cell. MLC multi level 2 bits per cell. TLC triple bit 3 bits per cell

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000056670/memory-and-storage/client-ssds.html

    waclark57
    waclark57
    3 months ago

    SN850 comes with TLC NAND which is inferior to the MLC NAND in terms of reliability.

    Can’t say as I agree with this conclusion. In fact, the article shows the WD drive to have a slightly higher MTBF, about 15% or so. So in that regard, with a 5 yr warranty on each drive, I’d say there is little to no difference in reliability.

    Now hardware encryption might be a good reason to go with the Samsung and for the current $10 difference in a 1TB stick, it’s probably worth it.

    Also, your comments about SLC cache seem misplaced. While both devices have it, you emphasized the Samsung over the WD. But, the WD handily beat the Samsung in write performance. So it would seem that the SLC isn’t all that important, in this example.

    Mark
    Mark
    2 months ago

    The 980 is TLC not MLC…?

    Ahmed
    Ahmed
    2 months ago

    Thank you so much for this article, i’m looking for an SSD for my ps5 and i found these at an interessting price… I was looking if there is any big diffrences…